Introduction
In Georgia, most sales tax audits aren’t about what you actually sold, they’re about statistics. Instead of reviewing every transaction, auditors rely on sampling shortcuts to estimate your liability. It’s faster for the Department of Revenue, but it often blows up into assessments that have little to do with your real numbers.
For business owners and CFOs, that means your liability can swing by tens of thousands of dollars based not on receipts, but on how the auditor picked the data. The most common culprit is block sampling, where a single period, often your busiest quarter, is projected across the entire audit. Add in a high margin of error, and you’re suddenly paying tax on sales that never happened.
The good news? These projections can be challenged. By showing seasonality, proposing stratified sampling, and exposing inflated margins of error, you can turn an overstated estimate into a fair, defensible result.
How Georgia Audit Sampling Works
The DOR is authorized to use sampling when reviewing large volumes of transactions. Under O.C.G.A. § 48-2-46, assessments may be based on the best information available, which includes statistical methods. In practice, this means auditors often select a short test period, review invoices and receipts, and then project results over three to four years.
Sampling is not inherently unfair, but its accuracy depends on methodology. If the sample period is not representative, or if auditors fail to account for seasonality, assessments are distorted. Businesses may be taxed on transactions that never occurred, or errors in one block may be multiplied across dozens of months.
Block Sampling in Georgia
Block sampling is the Georgia auditor’s favorite shortcut and one of the biggest reasons assessments spiral out of control. Instead of reviewing a fair cross-section of your sales, the auditor picks a single continuous period, usually one quarter, and stretches it across three or four years. It’s quick for them, expensive for you.
Take a typical case: the auditor tests your second quarter, finds $25,000 in errors, and suddenly projects a $300,000 liability. The problem? That quarter may have been your busiest stretch of the year. Restaurants see summer alcohol sales surge, retailers run seasonal promotions, and contractors often close major projects in one block of time. By ignoring those fluctuations, the Department ends up taxing activity that never happened.
We’ve seen it countless times across Georgia—block samples that take a hot quarter and turn it into a full-year average. If the sample doesn’t reflect how your business really operates, that’s not an estimate; it’s fiction. And it’s one you can challenge.
Seasonality as a Defence
Seasonality isn’t an excuse, it’s evidence. Georgia law allows sampling, but it also demands that any projection reflect your actual business patterns. When the auditor’s block falls in your busiest period, you have leverage to push back.
Start with your data. Pull monthly or quarterly sales reports showing how your volume changes through the year. A coastal restaurant might make 70 percent of its revenue in the summer; a retailer may double sales every December. When we walk into an audit with those numbers, it’s hard for the Department to claim that a single quarter represents the whole picture.
The Georgia Tax Tribunal has said it plainly, samples must be representative. With solid documentation, you can prove that the auditor’s chosen block inflates your results and force the Department to recalculate. Done right, a strong seasonality defense can cut a projection in half before it ever reaches the Tribunal.
Stratified Sampling Proposals
Stratified sampling divides transactions into groups based on time periods, product categories, or other characteristics, and tests each group separately. For instance, a contractor may propose testing large capital projects separately from small supply purchases. A retailer may suggest stratifying transactions by season.
The advantage is that errors in one category do not distort the entire projection. By proposing stratified sampling, taxpayers can present a more accurate picture of liability. The DOR may resist, as stratified sampling requires more work, but the Georgia Tax Tribunal often views these proposals favorably when supported by data.
When proposing alternatives, businesses should present statistical reports or expert affidavits. A CPA or statistician can calculate the expected error rate under stratified models and demonstrate why they are more reliable. Such exhibits strengthen negotiations at both the protest and Tribunal stages. Helpful references include the DOR’s audit manual guidance on sampling approaches.
Margin of Error Arguments
Another overlooked defence is the margin of error. In statistics, every sample has an error range. A finding of $25,000 with a 30 per cent margin of error may mean the true liability is between $17,500 and $32,500. When the margin is high, the reliability of the assessment is questionable.
Georgia law does not set a statutory cap on MOE, but taxpayers can argue that assessments must be supported by substantial evidence. If the sample results are so unreliable that they fail this standard, the Tribunal may reduce or reject projections. Expert testimony is particularly valuable in making MOE arguments. The Tribunal’s past decisions, available in its published opinions archive, provide examples where MOE challenges played a role.
By quantifying the margin of error, taxpayers shift the focus from whether sampling is allowed to whether it was reliable. This moves the discussion into evidentiary fairness, where businesses have a stronger footing.
Case Study: Retail Sampling Challenge
A Georgia retailer was audited for four years of sales tax. The auditor applied block sampling, using one high-volume holiday quarter. The projection produced a $220,000 liability. The retailer filed a timely protest, arguing seasonality made the block unrepresentative.
Exhibits included monthly sales reports showing December sales were double the annual average, as well as affidavits from managers explaining holiday promotions. A statistician’s affidavit proposed stratified sampling across all quarters. The DOR resisted at first but ultimately agreed to reduce the liability to $90,000. The margin of error argument also persuaded the Tribunal to waive penalties.
This case shows how seasonality evidence, stratified sampling proposals, and MOE challenges combine to fix inflated assessments.
Case Study: Contractor Dispute
A construction contractor was audited on materials purchases. The auditor selected invoices from one large capital project and projected errors across all projects. The result was a $200,000 liability. The contractor appealed, arguing that the block sample did not reflect smaller jobs.
The CFO submitted stratified sampling proposals, separating large projects from routine purchases. Exhibits included contracts, invoices, and affidavits from project managers. The Tribunal found that projecting from one atypical project was unreliable and ordered reassessment. The liability was cut by 60 percent.
The case illustrates how the block sampling Georgia auditors use can be challenged when taxpayers document why one project is not representative of all operations.
Practical Guidance
For CFOs and advisors, three steps are critical in Georgia audit sampling disputes. First, request full documentation of the auditor’s sampling method. Understanding the block selected and how errors were projected is essential. Second, compile seasonality data and transaction breakdowns to challenge unrepresentative samples. Third, consider hiring a statistician or CPA to prepare alternative models and margin of error reports.
Timely appeals also matter. If challenges are not raised at the protest stage, opportunities may be lost. Filing a protest within 45 days of the proposed assessment, or a petition within 45 days of the official assessment, preserves rights to challenge sampling before the Georgia Tax Tribunal.
FAQs
What is block sampling in Georgia audits?
It is when the auditor selects a continuous block of transactions, often one quarter, and projects results across the entire audit period.
Why is block sampling problematic?
It ignores seasonality and can exaggerate liability if the block is not representative.
What is stratified sampling?
It divides transactions into groups, such as by season or project type, and tests each group separately to produce a more accurate result.
Can I argue the margin of error in Georgia?
Yes. While Georgia law does not cap MOE, you can argue that unreliable results do not meet evidentiary standards.
Do I need an expert?
Expert testimony strengthens challenges, especially for stratified proposals and MOE analysis, but even internal sales data can be persuasive.
Conclusion
Georgia audit sampling is one of the most contested areas in sales tax audits. Block sampling Georgia auditors apply may create inflated assessments if seasonality, project variations, or shrinkage are ignored. By presenting stratified sampling alternatives and margin of error sales tax GA arguments, taxpayers can reduce or eliminate unfair liabilities.
The lesson for businesses is preparation. Maintain detailed sales and transaction records, monitor seasonality trends, and be ready to challenge unrepresentative samples. With timely protests and strong exhibits, CFOs and advisors can ensure that audit results reflect reality rather than flawed statistics.
Call to Action
Before you pay a dollar on a Georgia audit, take a smarter first step create your free Sales Tax Helper account. You’ll get access to real audit strategies, document templates, and sample protest letters built from the same tactics we use every day to fix bad samples.
If you’re already staring at a Notice of Assessment, upgrade to a Guided or Managed plan, and our Georgia audit team will walk you through the process or handle the entire appeal for you.
Whether you want to do it yourself with our tools or have us take over, you’ll know exactly what to expect—and how much of that assessment can be cut down.
Start your free account today and turn your Georgia audit into a plan, not a panic.